WebMar 29, 2024 · Judges can recuse themselves sua sponte or do so—or decline to do so—if a party moves for disqualification. ... parties are reluctant to file recusal motions for fear of offending a judge. ... WebApr 11, 2024 · 0:04. 2:46. A man suing Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey over his false inclusion on the sheriff's controversial Wheel of Fugitives has asked to move the suit …
Rule 17.1 - Motions, Ga. R. Juv. Ct. 17.1 Casetext Search + Citator
A motion to recuse is a legal motion filed in court that says a judge should be disqualified, or removed, from a legal case for a reason listed within CCP 170.1. The motion can be brought by either a prosecutor or a defense attorney . See more California Code of Civil Procedure 170.1 CCP states that a party to a civil or criminal case can try to remove a judge “for cause.” This means that the judge can be removed, or … See more If one of the reasons within CCP 170.1 exists, then a party can attempt to disqualify a judge by: 1. filing a motion to recuse, and 2. … See more In addition to challenges for cause and peremptory challenges, a judge can be removed in California based upon some statutes and the State Constitution. For example, California Probate Code 7060allows for the … See more Challenges “for cause” and different than peremptory challenges of a judge. A “peremptory” challenge means that a party can file a motion to … See more WebNov 21, 2024 · A judge cannot be forced to recuse himself from a case and therefore it is the judge who is vested with the power of recusal. The judge is not asked for a reason … der catch up
5.2 - Filing a Motion EOIR Department of Justice
WebNov 14, 2024 · (A) No appeal filed - Where a case has been decided by the immigration judge, and no appeal has been filed with the Board of Immigration Appeals, motions to … Web13 hours ago · “The defendants dropped their $1.5 million slander of title claim against Mr. Jackson prior to the hearing. In addition, Judge Grubbs denied the defendant’s motion for an injunction against a ... WebThe provision that the same procedure shall be had when the presiding judge disqualifies himself was omitted as unnecessary. (See section 291 et seq. and section 455 of this title .) Words, “at which the proceeding is to be heard,” were added to clarify the meaning of words, “before the beginning of the term.” (See U.S. v. Costea, D.C ... der camping-check